Reconceptualizing Industrial Measurement and Control Networks
PDF
HTML

Keywords

industrial measurement and control networks(IMCN)
distributed testing
industrial control systems
system integration
SharkNet

How to Cite

Geng, K., Qi, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, Q., Liu, G., Li, F., Chu, K., Hong, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Hu, H., Liu, L., Ren, J., & Liu, W. (2026). Reconceptualizing Industrial Measurement and Control Networks. Instrumentation, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.15878/j.instr.202600406

Abstract

 Driven by the growing needs of high-end equipment manufacturing, complex system verification, and distributed testing, industrial networks are moving beyond device connection and data communication to support deterministic control, real-time data exchange, and coordinated testing. Although deterministic communication technologies have improved time-critical transmission, local synchronization, and priority control, existing industrial control networks still face limits in wide-area distributed testing, multi-source synchronous acquisition, transient event capture, flexible scheduling, and dynamic adaptation. To address these challenges, the evolution of industrial networks is reviewed, and the fundamental differences between test-and-measurement tasks and logic-control tasks are compared in terms of service features, trigger modes, time references, and system boundaries. On this basis, a conceptual framework for industrial measurement and control networks (IMCN) is proposed. The framework defines ten core capabilities: synchronous execution, synchronous acquisition, precise time capture, strict priority assurance, sensor network support, deeply embedded built-in testing, adaptive multi-source timing, dynamic topology reconstruction, network-shared storage, and a native networked instrumentation bus architecture. It also highlights the connotations in four aspects: inheritance, testability, traceability, and autonomy. The applicability and practical value of the proposed conceptual framework are further illustrated through the case of SharkNet in aerospace and other high-end measurement and control systems, while its potential significance for self-organizing, reconstructible, and brain-inspired physical network architectures is also discussed.

https://doi.org/10.15878/j.instr.202600406
PDF
HTML
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Kun Geng, Yueyan Qi, Yingzi Zhang, Qiang Li, Gaigai Liu, Fei Li, Kangwei Chu, Yingping Hong, Huixin Zhang, Yanjun Zhang, Haifeng Hu, Lisheng Liu, Jianyun Ren, Wenyi Liu

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
79%
33%
Days to publication 
5
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles