Research on a simple analysis method for aqueous solution via total reflection x-ray fluorescence and argon peak normalization
HTML
PDF

Keywords

X-ray
TXRF
sample preparation
aqueous solution
Ar normalization
external standard methods

How to Cite

Wang, K., Fu, X., Duan, F., Jiang, J., & Wu, J. (2026). Research on a simple analysis method for aqueous solution via total reflection x-ray fluorescence and argon peak normalization. Instrumentation, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.15878/j.instr.202600380

Abstract

The commonly used internal standard method process for total reflection x-ray fluorescence (TXRF) is too cumbersome for online analysis. The accuracy of the method using argon peak in air as normalization standard is tested. It is compared with external standard method and Compton scattering line normalization method. The calibration curve was established using Ga standard solution. For the results of the argon peak normalization and external standard method, the correlation coefficients were 0.9995. For the results of the argon peak normalization and Ga peak normalization, the correlation coefficients were 0.997. The argon peak and Compton peak at different incident angles were compared. At the total reflection angle, the stability of the argon peak in low concentration samples is better than that of the Compton scattering line peak. This provides a theoretical basis for a simple analysis method of aqueous solutions based on argon peak normalization.

https://doi.org/10.15878/j.instr.202600380
HTML
PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Kuan Wang, Xiao Fu, Fajie Duan, Jiajia Jiang, Jingxin Wu

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
84%
33%
Days to publication 
178
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles