Flexible Sensing for Embodied Robotics: From Materials and Devices to System Integration and Closed-Loop Control
PDF
HTML

Keywords

flexible sensing
embodied robotics
multimodal fusion
closed-loop control
robot skin

How to Cite

Yang, H., Xian, S., Dong, X., Wang, C., & Zhong, Y. (2026). Flexible Sensing for Embodied Robotics: From Materials and Devices to System Integration and Closed-Loop Control. Instrumentation, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.15878/j.instr.202600434

Abstract

Flexible sensors that bend, stretch, and conform to curved surfaces are being integrated into robotic bodies with increasing frequency, allowing robots to acquire contact, deformation, and near-field environmental information on curved and large-deformation structures. High-sensitivity devices, however, do not automatically produce reliable task-level perception. This review is organized along a traceable evidence chain from observable, transduction, body integration, signal interpretation, and closed-loop control to task outcome, and compares five transduction mechanisms (piezoresistive, capacitive, piezoelectric, triboelectric, and optical) together with material platforms such as liquid metals and hydrogels. It further examines how structural assembly, stretchable interconnects, calibration and drift compensation, multimodal fusion, and feedback control affect system performance. Using dexterous manipulation, deformation and posture estimation, and human-robot interaction as the three task domains, the review separates device metrics, robot-integration demonstrations, and closed-loop task evidence, and applies this evidence grading consistently across all layers. Current work shows that contact tactile sensing has formed a relatively complete real-robot closed loop under limited objects and operating conditions, whereas environmental sensing, cross-platform transfer, and long-term whole-body deployment still lack unified validation. Future priorities should shift from isolated sensitivity improvement toward comparable evaluation under unified conditions, reporting of end-to-end latency and maintenance costs, and perception-decision-action loops with fail-safe fallback.

https://doi.org/10.15878/j.instr.202600434
PDF
HTML
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Hongxi Yang, Shuai Xian, Xin Dong, Chengcai Wang, Yong Zhong

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
84%
33%
Days to publication 
86
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles